Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alicia Barnett vs Xenia Bandurowska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Barnett vs Bandurowska analysis and find out who is favored!
Alicia Barnett vs Xenia Bandurowska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Barnett has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bandurowska has won 44.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Barnett, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bandurowska has won 53.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Barnett has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bandurowska has saved 51.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Barnett has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bandurowska winning 47.83% (W/L 22/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Barnett has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 87/ 77), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 5/ 14). Bandurowska has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 21/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 20/ 23).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Barnett winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Barnett winning 2 and Bandurowska winning 0. The last match between Barnett and Bandurowska was at the W100 Grodzisk Mazowiecki, 01-08-2022, Q3, Hard with Alicia Barnett getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Barnett and Bandurowska have played a deciding set 0 times, with Barnett winning 0 times and Bandurowska 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Barnett winning 0, and Bandurowska 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Barnett has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bandurowska has played against players with an average rank of 89.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Barnett has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bandurowska has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Barnett has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bandurowska has converted 52.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Barnett 1 - 0 Bandurowska
835
Rank
453
High
30
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
50% (146-146)
Career Total W/L
50% (41-41)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
54% (13-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Barnett VS Bandurowska H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Alicia Barnett | Xenia Bandurowska |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Barnett VS Bandurowska H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alicia Barnett | Xenia Bandurowska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (13/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (32/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (295/263) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (13/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 44.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 55% (446/805) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (262/446) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (166/359) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 56% (48/85) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (356/797) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 54% (13/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Alicia Barnett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Jana Fett
Player
Alicia Barnett
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Alicia Barnett
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikol Rivkin
Player
Alicia Barnett
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisca Jorge
Player
Alicia Barnett
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Alicia Barnett
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alicia Barnett
Player
Anna Siskova
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
37 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Alicia Barnett
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(5) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Alicia Barnett
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alicia Barnett
Player
Amandine Monnot
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Xenia Bandurowska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Xenia Bandurowska
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xenia Bandurowska
Player
Lucia Ros Parres
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xenia Bandurowska
Player
Candela Cimarra Munoz
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Seye
Player
Xenia Bandurowska
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 0-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessia Popescu
Player
Xenia Bandurowska
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
96)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
Break Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
51%
(
53 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Xenia Bandurowska
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Selina Dal
Player
Xenia Bandurowska
77%
(
62 of
81)
1st Serve %
41%
(
33 of
81)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Barnett Vs Bandurowska Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
